> I'm Zin Wong. Perhaps Viviane would like to participate in ASIS
> (Association for
> Sustainable Information Society) - checkup on the URL and email to you
> tommorow.
> where you can support 'fair share' of information since in the information
> era the economic processes 
> are information-controlled and that may be a reason why people with
> greater access to infor (most likely richer nations
and IT educated) will always have the upperhand. Urbanization and computers
are part of the system. 
        You will have 'population control' by whom - which culture, race or
creed may I asked?


> Reply To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:         Tuesday, December 07, 1999 2:11 AM
> To:   STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT
> Subject:      Re: Society for Human Population Control
> 
> I agree as well.  It is difficult to work within the confins of a power
> structure that seems to be actively destroying most of the planet.
> Overpopulation has to be addressed as the primary focus.  Until that is
> curbed
> most other work is futile......
> 
> Wong Ee Ling wrote:
> 
> > For some reason Russell makes perfect sense. What a disillusionment.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Eeling @ Zin
> > Singapore
> >
> > > ----------
> > > From:         vikki charles[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Reply To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent:         Thursday, December 02, 1999 8:58 PM
> > > To:   STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT
> > > Subject:      Re: Society for Human Population Control
> > >
> > > I agree with you Russell.
> > > On Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:02:10 +1100 Russell Edwards
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 12:34:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > I want to invite ECOFEM members to visit and join the Society for
> > > Human
> > > > > Population Control. We are a group which believes that the
> fundamental
> > >
> > > > > problem of the human race is overpopulation, and we want a
> > > constitutional
> > > > > amendment to induce the US Government to get involved. Our address
> is:
> > > >
> > > >  With respect, I ask this in the hope of stimulating discussion:
> > > > Isn't it a fairly common thread of ecofeminism to feel that "the
> > > > fundamental problem of the human race" is first world
> (male-dominated/
> > > > male-style) exploitation of the third world and the planet in
> general?
> > > > Isn't lobbying congress just going to make them drop a batch of
> condoms
> > > > from a helicopter over third world countries they are actively
> grinding
> > > > into the dust? Put another way, isn't the solution going to involve
> a
> > > > major paradigm shift that can't really happen through lobbying
> existing
> > > > power structures?
> > > >
> > > > Russell
> > > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------
> > > vikki charles
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> 

Reply via email to