I heard about this plan the americans had - top secret -
where they knew they had to cut down on population so they
made up 2 plan thingys. The frst was they created the AIDS
virus and gave it in Hepatitis B "vaccines" to social
undesirables eg gays, blacks etc. The second was they told
3rd world countries they had to control their populations
or they would receive no more help from the UN or whatever.
If any countries refused a civil war would mysteriously
break out wherein more civilians - especially women of
childbearing age and children - were kiled, and the rebels
that started it all turned out to have been funded and
trained by the CIA.
Just a thought on how the world population will be
controled.
It will always be the upper classes controlling the lower
classes and the "developed" countries controlling the
"undeveloped".
because they can.
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 14:18:32 +0800 Wong Ee Ling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm Zin Wong. Perhaps Viviane would like to participate in ASIS
> > (Association for
> > Sustainable Information Society) - checkup on the URL and email to you
> > tommorow.
> > where you can support 'fair share' of information since in the information
> > era the economic processes
> > are information-controlled and that may be a reason why people with
> > greater access to infor (most likely richer nations
> and IT educated) will always have the upperhand. Urbanization and computers
> are part of the system.
> You will have 'population control' by whom - which culture, race or
> creed may I asked?
>
>
> > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 2:11 AM
> > To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT
> > Subject: Re: Society for Human Population Control
> >
> > I agree as well. It is difficult to work within the confins of a power
> > structure that seems to be actively destroying most of the planet.
> > Overpopulation has to be addressed as the primary focus. Until that is
> > curbed
> > most other work is futile......
> >
> > Wong Ee Ling wrote:
> >
> > > For some reason Russell makes perfect sense. What a disillusionment.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Eeling @ Zin
> > > Singapore
> > >
> > > > ----------
> > > > From: vikki charles[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 8:58 PM
> > > > To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT
> > > > Subject: Re: Society for Human Population Control
> > > >
> > > > I agree with you Russell.
> > > > On Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:02:10 +1100 Russell Edwards
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 12:34:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > > I want to invite ECOFEM members to visit and join the Society for
> > > > Human
> > > > > > Population Control. We are a group which believes that the
> > fundamental
> > > >
> > > > > > problem of the human race is overpopulation, and we want a
> > > > constitutional
> > > > > > amendment to induce the US Government to get involved. Our address
> > is:
> > > > >
> > > > > With respect, I ask this in the hope of stimulating discussion:
> > > > > Isn't it a fairly common thread of ecofeminism to feel that "the
> > > > > fundamental problem of the human race" is first world
> > (male-dominated/
> > > > > male-style) exploitation of the third world and the planet in
> > general?
> > > > > Isn't lobbying congress just going to make them drop a batch of
> > condoms
> > > > > from a helicopter over third world countries they are actively
> > grinding
> > > > > into the dust? Put another way, isn't the solution going to involve
> > a
> > > > > major paradigm shift that can't really happen through lobbying
> > existing
> > > > > power structures?
> > > > >
> > > > > Russell
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------
> > > > vikki charles
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> >
>
----------------------
vikki charles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
