It is unfortunate that Ms. Lahey generalizes from her own very negative 
  personal experiences to the whole field of fisheries, and she is not 
the only one who has done so in this thread.  Do I think that there are 
sexist individuals in science who will use whatever power they have to 
enforce their distorted views (like her undergraduate advisor), 
certainly.  Do I think that fish ecology or fisheries as a field is full 
of gender bias -- well consider this fact, both the president elect and 
current president of the American Fisheries Society are female as was 
the president two years ago (that's 3 out of 4 for you non-quantitative 
folks <g>).  Frankly, if one took the general population of AFS members 
and calculated the percentage that are women you certainly would 
conclude that AFS is doing a great job combating gender bias by electing 
women to the highest office in the society, way out of proportion to 
their frequency in the society.  Similarly, I have had only four female 
PhD students, less than half as many as my male PhD students - evidence 
of gender bias - I doubt it.

Are there fewer fisheries female faculty than are represented in the 
grad student population as a whole -- I don't know but I will agree with 
Ms. Lahey that there are not enough female role models in most of the 
"applied sciences"?  What can we do about this, well we can seek out 
well qualified female/minority/gay/group of your choice students and 
provide them with a supportive and stimulating atmosphere so that they 
can reach their potential.  Frankly, that's what most of my colleagues 
and collaborators are doing. Ms. Lahey is right that we need to start 
doing this at the undergraduate level, rather than at the graduate 
school level.  I have to admit though, that the description of fisheries 
that Ms. Lahey provides is quite foreign to the one that I work in.

As for the general topic, I guess that at this point in my career I'm 
more interested in what I can do as an individual, or how we can help 
each other solve these problems via our professional activities rather 
than make general accusations regarding "discrimination of your choice" 
in science, with frankly, little evidence other than our own personal 
experiences.  These are difficult and complex issues, but they're not 
ones that I'm really interested in researching.  Instead, I'd rather 
make my own personal contributions to combating these ills, which 
includes intervention in cases where discrimination is occurring within 
my sphere of influence.  Sign a petition, sure, go to a demonstration, 
maybe, but I just feel that I'm having more of an impact by trying to 
train students from under-represented groups, which actually is quite 
difficult given the level of competition for these students if they're 
well qualified (and that includes women).

Frankly, if a faculty member at our university displayed the behavior 
that Ms. Lahey's advisor did, then they would be in big trouble very 
quickly, and I can't really imagine this being a pattern and other 
faculty standing by and doing nothing.  In addition, I've never been on 
a search committee in which "under-represented groups" wasn't brought up 
as a point of consideration, even though it is now illegal. Of course 
here I am just using my own personal experiences, but the point is to 
show students that Ms. Lahey's description of the field,while apparently 
accurate for her, is not accurate for many of us.  Oh, and yes I had a 
letter writer who sabotoged me on a few graduate school letters, but my 
advisor  apparently saw through the letter writer's attempts (as did 
someone in another program) because I got in.  In fact anyone who's been 
in the field for awhile has some sort of similar story to tell - i.e., 
getting screwed on reviews, promotions, etc.  Frankly, not everyone is 
nice in academia, nor even ethical, but I doubt that the frequency of 
this behavior is any different from behavior found in many professions.

I am writing this response so that people, especially female undergrads, 
  who are not familiar with fisheries will not be left with only one 
point of view on the field.  I don't really want to debate the subject, 
and as one recent poster said -- let's work to solve these things not 
just complain about them.

cheers, g2

-- 
Gary D. Grossman

Distinguished Research Professor - Animal Ecology
Warnell School of Forest and Natural Resources
University of Georgia
Athens, GA, USA 30602

http://www.arches.uga.edu/~grossman

Board of Editors - Animal Biodiversity and Conservation
Editorial Board - Freshwater Biology
Editorial Board - Ecology Freshwater Fish

Reply via email to