My brother (who works in marketing) recently sent me the e-mail below. I don't intend this to turn into a discussion of the general public's understanding of uncertainty in science, I am just wondering if anyone is aware of a study that looked at the percentage of scientists that think climate change is caused primarily by anthropogenic factors vs. entirely a natural cycle. Thanks.
E-mail from my brother: "I've had it up to here with a few people in my office who say that there are just as many science people who are against Global Warming and say it's a big cycle - as there are those who believe this "hoax". Do you have any kind of article that I can use to say this argument is simply untrue? I know it's like arguing with a brick wall, but having some ammo to use would be nice."
