Its funny you should mention this -- I've been in a heated facebook
argument with a former classmate over this (aren't social networking
sites great?) The wikipedia entry is good
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Surveys_of_scientists_and_scientific_literature),
but the best article, in my opinion, is the Oreskes 2004 Science article
(http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/306/5702/1686.pdf -- you'll need
access to Science Mag to see this).
--j
Jeremy Claisse wrote:
Turns out there a several good references listed on wikipedia under global
warming controversy.
Thank you to those who already responded.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news on behalf of Jeremy
Claisse
Sent: Mon 2/16/2009 7:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Reference for % of scientists that think climate change is
caused by humans?
My brother (who works in marketing) recently sent me the e-mail below. I
don't intend this to turn into a discussion of the general public's
understanding of uncertainty in science, I am just wondering if anyone
is aware of a study that looked at the percentage of scientists that
think climate change is caused primarily by anthropogenic factors vs.
entirely a natural cycle.
Thanks.
--
Jonathan A. Greenberg, PhD
Postdoctoral Scholar
Center for Spatial Technologies and Remote Sensing (CSTARS)
University of California, Davis
One Shields Avenue
The Barn, Room 250N
Davis, CA 95616
Cell: 415-794-5043
AIM: jgrn307, MSN: [email protected], Gchat: jgrn307
