ecologists are expected to be observant and inferential, but spiritual? religion and spirituality are typically "off-limit" topics amongst scientific colleagues due to the recent evolution-religion hyperpolarization and, well, belief systems should be a personal choice, either you believe or you don't. research ecologists are reluctant to accept that there is freedom in making a commitment to belief systems. also fundamental religious folk are reluctant to accept the world as anything but painted by the hand of a god. this way of polarizing thought (evolution vs. religion) is a classic case of a category error.
- Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are humans part of nature? malcolm McCallum
- Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are humans part of nature? James J. Roper
- Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are humans part of nature? Thomas Hardy
- Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are humans part of nature? edgardo garrido
- Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are humans part of nature? Howard Whiteman
- Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are humans part of nature? Wayne Tyson
- Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are humans part of natur... Michael Clary
- Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are humans part of n... Julia Fiske
- [ECOLOG-L] are humans part of nature? Adam Herbert
- [ECOLOG-L] Are humans part of nature? Victor Bogosian III
- [ECOLOG-L] are humans part of nature? Adam Herbert
- Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are humans part of nature? SJ Melles, Environment Canada
- Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are humans part of natur... Cochran-Stafira, D. Liane
- [ECOLOG-L] Education Learning Kno... Wayne Tyson
