There's a very good article in the NY Times (Aug 10, by Carol Kaesuk 
Yoon), which may shed some light on this topic. It's called 'Reviving the 
Lost Art of Naming the World.' 

You can view the full article here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/11/science/11naming.html?
pagewanted=1&8dpc&_r=1

The article finishes with the following thoughts:

"Today few people are proficient in the ordering and naming of life. We 
are willfully ... losing the ability to order and name and therefore 
losing a connection to and a place in the living world. 
No wonder so few of us can really see what is out there. Even when scads 
of insistent wildlife appear with a flourish right in front of us, and 
there is such life always — hawks migrating over the parking lot, great 
colorful moths banging up against the window at night — we barely seem to 
notice. We are so disconnected from the living world that we can live in 
the midst of a mass extinction, of the rapid invasion everywhere of new 
and noxious species, entirely unaware that anything is happening. Happily, 
changing all this turns out to be easy. Just find an organism, any 
organism, small, large, gaudy, subtle — anywhere, and they are everywhere —
 and get a sense of it, its shape, color, size, feel, smell, sound. Give a 
nod to Professor Franclemont and meditate, luxuriate in its beetle-ness, 
its daffodility. Then find a name for it. Learn science’s name, one of 
countless folk names, or make up your own. To do so is to change 
everything, including yourself. Because once you start noticing organisms, 
once you have a name for particular beasts, birds and flowers, you can’t 
help seeing life and the order in it, just where it has always been, all 
around you."

I think the meaning in this message is that the idea of whether or not 
humans are a part of nature comes back to how our language shapes the way 
we view the world around us. I once had Karel Klinka as a guest lecturer 
for a UBC forest science field course and he stressed that students should 
learn the names and ecology of the plants and organisms around them as 
they would their own family. I can't say I have fully embraced his advice, 
but I am learning. 

Reply via email to