Ecolog:
Methinks there might be even more elephants in the saloon--perhaps of many
hues.
It has been my observation in the past that I have learnt more in the
hallways, WC's, and saloons than I have being driven nuts listening to
20-minute "presentations" (attention ethologists!), in darkened halls
enduring the maddening, warp-speeding of laser traces across extensive,
unreadable tables and under-wowed by power-pointless pontifications and
dull-drumming, self-indulgent preening reading of newly-minted
number-crunchers, ad nauseam.
"Yea, tho there be the occasional exception, I have long dreamt of
unorganized groupings, pre-read pre-publication papers cussed and discussed
with the authors in a more playfully serious atmosphere than the arbitrary,
jammed, expensive "meetings" at resort destinations. I even participated in
one experiment in unorganizing such a gathering; it was soon organized into
a "real" organization, however. The only such unorganization I ever knew to
last was "The Friends of the Pleistocene," which still exists, I believe, in
some form. Not a bad model, though, even though it would never pass PC
muster these days . . . too much wild behavior back in the sixties and
seventies.
The trouble with unorganizations is that they don't pad résumés or bring in
money for institutions, not to mention "status." With or without booze, they
seem to me to work better than organized meetings.
WT
PS: Seriously, folks, whatever it takes to puncture caution, lower guards,
and stir up passions. I may yet collect the beer Silvert promised me a long
time ago, but I'd rather he came to San Diego . . . I love Europe, but have
come to hate airlines so much . . .
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Inouye" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 5:09 AM
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] alcohol consumption and citation counts
http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2010/09/make_mine_a_double.html
Make mine a double - September 15, 2010
There have been
<http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100813/full/news.2010.406.html>some
radical suggestions to increase citation counts
of late but heavy drinking would probably rank at
the bottom of most researchers' lists.
Yet a new study has found that the world's most
highly cited ecologists and environmental
scientists typically consume more than double the
amount imbibed by the general population.
<http://www.springerlink.com/content/j5205442788316v6/>Published
in the October issue of
<http://www.springerlink.com/content/j5205442788316v6/>Scientometrics,
John Parker, a post-doctoral sociologist at the
National Center for Ecological Analysis and
Synthesis at the University of California, Santa
Barbara, and colleagues report the results of a
survey of the drinking habits of 124 of the most
highly cited researchers in ecology and
environmental science: the vast majority men aged
between 50 and 70 based in either North America or Western Europe.
The results reveal that consumption for this
group averages around 7 alcoholic beverages per
week, about 2.5 drinks over the weekly
consumption of the average American. Though a
fifth of the group does not drink, more than half
consume 10 or more alcoholic beverages a week,
20% consume 12 or more and 10% consumer 21 or
more. The largest consumer downed 31 per week.
The researchers are quick to point out the
obvious - correlation does not equal causation.
"We are definitely not saying 'drink more to do
better'," Parker stresses. But he does believe
that more and better information is needed to
unravel the observed relationship and the
"non-scientific activities that affect scientific productivity".
The results support the positive association
between national per capita beer consumption and
a country's citations per paper reported
<http://www.springerlink.com/content/lp34234k59473xkt/>in
a 2009 paper by Canadian ecologist Christopher
Lortie, who collaborated with Parker on the current paper.
But they stand in contrast to a
<http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16551.x/abstract>2008
survey of Czech ecologists by Thomas Grim, also
an ecologist. Grim, based at Palacky University
in the Czech Republic, found the opposite: that
increased levels of beer consumption were
associated with lower numbers of citations.
"Because of well documented negative and causal
effects of ethanol, independently of dose, on
both mental performance and health, I find it
unlikely that the Parker et al. finding reflects
more than a spurious relationship," Grim told Nature News.
Eminent Oxford ecologist Bob May - a lifelong
teetotaller - also said he did not recognise
Parker's picture. "My experience is that my
ecologist friends are not at all heavy drinkers."
Michael Hochberg from the University of
Montpellier in France speculated on why - if this
were so - highly cited researchers might be
pushed to drink more. They might attend more
functions, be more "stressed out", or they may
just be "past their heyday and drowning their sorrows", he suggested.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.445 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3141 - Release Date: 09/17/10
12:24:00
