Ecologers,
Building on Prof. W. Tyson's comment...
I completely agree. Restoring a degraded ecosystem to its pristine pure
stage is almost impossible, not to mention the costs involved in
the mitigation process.
There were (and still are) successful attempts of regenerating barren
and ultra degraded places in Brazil (i.e. mine sites) by Prof. Ademir
Reis and others. Prof. Reis also committed several mistakes in his
attempts until he figured it out the best ways to achieve some sort of
succession and vegetation.
From my humble point of view, important long-term goal and
considerations to have in mind are:
1. the reestablishment of ecosystem structure (not an easy task!);
2. the reestablishment of ecosystem functions and processes (consider
yourself lucky when this is accomplished);
3. Finally, the reestablishment of the flow of ecosystem services.
These events take time and resources but are worth doing.
Just my 2 cts!
Juan P. Alvez
On 1/18/2011 4:04 PM, Wayne Tyson wrote:
Jason and Ecolog:
Many years ago (early 1980's?) I did a "paper" that I think I called "Ecosystem Restoration and
Landscaping: A Comparison." I don't remember the name of the conference and I'm not sure of the place, but it
might have been one of the early conferences of the Society for Ecological Restoration (SER), maybe it's less-formal
precursor, "Native Plant Restoration" or something like that, and I believe it was held in Berkeley, at some
big old wooden hotel in the Berkeley Hills. I was a pretty young upstart, and I don't recall anyone paying much
attention to it. [Note: I looked through some old files and found a folder: "Restoration and Landscaping: a
Comparison." 2nd Native Plant Revegetation Symposium, 1987, but there was no paper in it. I was close but a bit
foggy. Even it might be wrong; a search revealed other papers which said it was 1987 and the location was San Diego.
Maybe a better searcher can find it, or maybe someone has the Proceedings--however, I can't even be sure that it was
published. I wasn't so young as it turns out, but an upstart nonetheless, I guess.]
Anyway, I hope Jason or others can do a better job than I did in communicating
what I still think is an important--in fact, crucial point: that
landscaping/gardening is a whole different paradigm from ecosystem restoration
and management, and recognizing that crucial distinction is fundamental to a
real understanding of the interplay between Nature and culture.
I spent at least 15 years making the same fundamental mistake over and over
again-using gardening/agronomic/landscaping practices in the attempt to
restore/manage ecosystems. Failure after failure after failure, even though I
had training in ecology and botany-and in
gardening/agronomy/landscaping/landscape architecture. My fundamental error was
letting the latter paradigm contaminate the former; I probably made the same
mistake that remains common-thinking that they were synonymous. I could have
not been more wrong-they are in fundamental opposition to each other.
Not wanting to blather on and one with this post, I'll stop here for now . . .
WT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Hernandez"<[email protected]>
To:<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 5:08 PM
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Conservation or just gardening?
This question is inspired by a conversation with a former employer. When do our
interventions cease to be conservation and become gardening?
For the sake of argument, I was taking the purist position: that ideally, we
want to be able to put a fence around a natural area and walk away, letting
nature manage it. But as my employer rightly pointed out, that is just not a
realistic expectation in the 21st century, what with invasive species, systemic
pollution, human pressures on surrounding areas, and countless other factors
which will not go away. But of course, she also knew that there is a degree of
intervention which crosses the line from conservation to gardening, that is,
caring for a population that no longer participates in its ecosystem processes.
There is, of course, a continuum of interventions. Removal of invasive
competitors is a relatively light intervention; growing seedlings in a
greenhouse and then planting them out is more intensive; maintaining an in
vitro germplasm collection still more intensive. Are there any recognized
criteria for determining the boundary between conservation and gardening? And
if a species is beyond saving with conservation, how worthwhile is it to save
that species with gardening? Can we determine when a species' only hope is
gardening?
Jason Hernandez
Biological Science Technician, USDA Forest Service
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3386 - Release Date: 01/17/11
07:34:00
--
Juan P Alvez
PhD Candidate
Rubenstein School of Environmental and Natural Resources
Gund Institute for Ecological Economics
University of Vermont
802-655-9739
"Me crié pastando cabras, no bien aprendí a caminar. Desde que nací mi mamá empezó a
llevarme en su espalda y así crecí encima de ella escuchando sus coplas. Y mi padre
cantaba acompañado por la guitarra. Por eso salí cantor."
Tomas Lipan (Cantor Purmamarqueno de Jujuy)
