I think that FTP works great on it's own. The major concern here are the
'value adds' that you get from VAN's, such as the ability to have all of
your data tracked and archived and have a secure connection through to your
trading partner. Straight FTP forces you to give up those 'value adds'.
There are products available and standards published to give you most of the
'value adds' when you go direct across the Internet (FTP being one protocol)
if you have concerns about those issues.
Ian Verhaegen
-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Piaskowski (IT) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
<mailto:[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp Vs VANS
I am seeking enlightenment about the value of using ftp versus a VAN to
transmit X12/EDIFACT data. Or, should it be used as an adjunct, to VANS.
That's probably what we would do anyway. It seems cost might be a factor.
Anything else? Your input will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
<http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/>
=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
