On its face, this is a coincidence ... not a duplication. The different
GS IDs indicates two different trading relationships. The context of
a transaction set goes from outside in. It is acknowledging the
successful transmission of 855 #114 and 855 #115 from company
AAAA to company BBBB, group 1111 to group BBBB. A second
set of 2 855s were sent to group XXXX in company BBBB. We don't
know if they are really just two buyers who share one desk, or two
different companies within a corporation, located on opposite sides of
the Earth. We do know they are sufficiently distinct to have their own
group IDs.
Logically, I agree it is most likely this is a mistake on the part of the
sender,
and that the 997 was sent improperly at least once.
Howard Parks
1 Peter 4:10
=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
