I've got this mixed up as far as who sent who what. But the point remains ... two distinct GS IDs means two distinct trading relationships. Therefore no duplication. Howard Parks 1 Peter 4:10 > -----Original Message----- > From: Parks, Howard (E) Ext 5288 > Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 10:32 AM > To: 'EDI-L' > Subject: RE: Duplicate Transaction Identification <snip> > It is acknowledging the > successful transmission of 855 #114 and 855 #115 from company > AAAA to company BBBB, group 1111 to group BBBB. <snip> ======================================================================= To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Brian Lehrhoff
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Anthony Beecher
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Neil Flynn
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Tim Cronin
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Karen Norton
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Maria Safavi
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Anthony Beecher
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Fred Piaskowski (IT)
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Mike Rawlins
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Parks, Howard (E) Ext 5288
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Parks, Howard (E) Ext 5288
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Anthony Beecher
- Duplicate Transaction Identification Whitehead, Anthony
- Re: Duplicate Transaction Identification Tim Cronin
- Duplicate Transaction Identification Paraiso, David
