(staring incredulously)

I've had to read "raw EDI data" for about 5 discrete
questions/answers/investigations in the past 4 days, probably 10 out of the
last 36 hours this week I've been in one "raw EDI" archive or another doing
one thing or another.

Hmm.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Mattias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 2:28 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Is EDI dead?
> 
> 
> 
> > Absolutely EDI is human readable.  Much more so than XML 
> with the tag
> > structure.  One of the reasons I like it so much.  :)
> 
> I agree totally, but....  the last time I read some "raw edi 
> data" on a screen in front of a client, he suggested I was not of this
> planet.
> 
> MCM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> .  
> Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject 
> prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
> Access the list online at:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



.  
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Access the list online at:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to