I'm surprised to see many of these posts. The last time I shared my
displeasure concerning the drummond certification on this list everyone that
responded collectively seemed to say, "You're delusional, Rick Drummond is a
great guy - stop ragging on him." Well, here's another helping of my
worthless opinion. :)

I feel like even though this is supposed to assist adoption & compatibility
of this "new" technology - it actually stifles the technology with a costly,
bureaucratic pile of overhead.

I don't remember anything about developers having to certify that their
email software could interoperate.

Why doesn't Drummond go ahead and certify that our EDI translators can pass
plain text files to each other?
Maybe they can certify that everyone's butt will fit comfortably on all
toilets...


Travis- 

-----Original Message-----
From: James Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Re: Reducing/eliminating our EDI VAN


You are talking about going down a slippery slope. 

If you lie to your customer in an official document you risk; being
disqualified as a supplier, getting fired, possible fraud or other charges
if anyone wanted to take it that far. 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: w_cohen99 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 12:47 AM
  Subject: [EDI-L] Re: Reducing/eliminating our EDI VAN


  Well that is a good point. The survey requires you to list it. 
  Who's to say that listing something that you don't have/use is a 
  problem? Unless down the road if there are problems between you and 
  the tp and it is traced somehow back to your non-certified software 
  I wonder if the originator (or whomever wanted the certification) 
  would then have legal/monetary recourse.

  Walter
  --- In [email protected], "Carl Galgano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  >
  > How is your TP going to know what software you are using? 
  > I for one think the who Drummond certification is a bunch of 
  crap. This
  > reminds me of the uselessness added by the UCC a decade ago. I 
  have
  > implement AS2 for many of my customers, and while the question may 
  be on a
  > survey, is there any way for the TP to really know? If it works 
  then it
  > works.
  > cjg 
  > 
  > 
  > Carl J. Galgano
  > EDI Consulting Services, Inc.
  > 770-422-2995
  > www.ediconsulting.com
  > 
  > 600 Kennesaw Avenue
  > Suite 400 
  > Marietta, GA 30060
  > 
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
  Behalf Of Earl
  > Wertheimer
  > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 3:27 PM
  > To: w_cohen99; [email protected]
  > Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Re: Reducing/eliminating our EDI VAN
  > 
  > Walter
  > 
  > Wrong ;-)
  > FreeAS2 is nSoftware IP*Works v7. 
  > http://www.drummondgroup.com/html-v2/as2-companies.html
  > <http://www.drummondgroup.com/html-v2/as2-companies.html> 
  > 
  > They've renamed the 'certification' to 'ebusinessready.org' and 
  linked it to
  > GS1.
  > Realistically, how many organizations would be able to provide
  > 'certification' 
  > that their software is compatible? As far as I know, Drummond (the 
  writers
  > of the AS2 standard) is the only organization that do this testing 
  (for an
  > exhorbitant amount of money).
  > 
  > If you search www.ebusinessready.org, you will find 
  http://www.gs1us.org/
  > <http://www.gs1us.org/> Of course a search on GS1 for AS2 or 
  ebusinessready
  > on their site results in no matches.
  > This is yet another example of BS 'certification' that results in 
  no
  > additional benefit other than confusion.
  > 
  > PS: I am an independent EDI consultant, and receive no commission, 
  etc, etc,
  > etc...
  > 
  > > Freeas2 will not help me, as it is not compliant, a tleast not 
  via 
  > > Drummond Group.
  > > 
  > > Walter
  > > 
  > > --- In [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> , 
  Earl
  > Wertheimer <earlw@> wrote:
  > > >
  > > > Walter
  > > > 
  > > > > My top 5 TPs state that I must buy a compliant (UCC / 
  Drummond
  > > > > Group) EDIINT product in order to go AS2 with them and most 
  of
  > > these
  > > > > products are rather pricey. For instance Inovis BizConnect 
  is 
  > > > > $4,500 for up to 25 TPs and $900/yr maintenance plus $1k 
  remote 
  > > > > install. Anyone making use of any other 'reasonably priced'
  > > EDIINT
  > > > > products?
  > > > 
  > > > http://www.freeas2.com/order.aspx 
  > > > <http://www.freeas2.com/order.aspx>
  > > > 25 licenses (NOT TPs) for $999.00
  > > > 
  > > > the 1st is free ;-)
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > Some TPs may require 2 licenses. Keep that in mind.
  > > > 
  > > > Earl Wertheimer
  > > > earlw@
  > > > http://www.spe-edi.com <http://www.spe-edi.com>
  > > >
  > > 



...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>

Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS 
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to