On 2017-07-19 22:44:10, Michael D Kinney wrote:
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642
> 
> Add top level License.txt file with the BSD 2-Clause
> License that is used by the majority of the EKD II open
> source project content.  Merge copyright statements
> from the BSD 2-Clause License files in each package
> directory and remove the duplication License.txt
> file from package directories.
> 
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrew Fish <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <[email protected]>
> ---
>  AppPkg/License.txt                     | 25 -----------------
>  ArmPkg/License.txt                     | 26 ------------------
>  ArmPlatformPkg/License.txt             | 25 -----------------
>  BaseTools/License.txt                  | 25 -----------------
>  BeagleBoardPkg/License.txt             | 26 ------------------
>  CorebootModulePkg/License.txt          | 25 -----------------
>  CorebootPayloadPkg/License.txt         | 25 -----------------
>  CryptoPkg/License.txt                  | 25 -----------------
>  DuetPkg/License.txt                    | 25 -----------------
>  EdkCompatibilityPkg/License.txt        | 29 --------------------

ECP currently has a 3-clause BSD license in License.txt. Is this
change intended? I think that the ECP source file headers may point to
the 2-clause BSD license though.

Maybe worth noting in the commit message.

>  EdkShellBinPkg/License.txt             | 25 -----------------
>  EdkShellPkg/License.txt                | 25 -----------------
>  EmbeddedPkg/License.txt                | 26 ------------------
>  EmulatorPkg/License.txt                | 25 -----------------
>  FatBinPkg/License.txt                  | 25 -----------------
>  FatPkg/License.txt                     | 25 -----------------
>  IntelFrameworkModulePkg/License.txt    | 25 -----------------
>  IntelFrameworkPkg/License.txt          | 25 -----------------
>  IntelFsp2Pkg/License.txt               | 25 -----------------
>  IntelFsp2WrapperPkg/License.txt        | 25 -----------------
>  IntelFspPkg/License.txt                | 25 -----------------
>  IntelFspWrapperPkg/License.txt         | 25 -----------------
>  IntelSiliconPkg/License.txt            | 25 -----------------
>  ArmVirtPkg/License.txt => License.txt  |  6 ++--
>  MdeModulePkg/License.txt               | 25 -----------------
>  MdePkg/License.txt                     | 25 -----------------
>  NetworkPkg/License.txt                 | 25 -----------------
>  Nt32Pkg/License.txt                    | 25 -----------------
>  Omap35xxPkg/License.txt                | 26 ------------------
>  OptionRomPkg/License.txt               | 25 -----------------
>  OvmfPkg/License.txt                    | 50 
> ----------------------------------

I'm not sure about Laszlo, but I prefer to keep the current
License.txt at the OvmfPkg root. It gives an 'overview' of the
licenses used in the package without having to search the
sub-directories.

-Jordan

>  PcAtChipsetPkg/License.txt             | 25 -----------------
>  PerformancePkg/License.txt             | 25 -----------------
>  QuarkPlatformPkg/License.txt           | 25 -----------------
>  QuarkSocPkg/License.txt                | 25 -----------------
>  SecurityPkg/License.txt                | 25 -----------------
>  ShellBinPkg/License.txt                | 25 -----------------
>  ShellPkg/License.txt                   | 25 -----------------
>  SignedCapsulePkg/License.txt           | 25 -----------------
>  SourceLevelDebugPkg/License.txt        | 25 -----------------
>  StdLib/License.txt                     | 25 -----------------
>  StdLibPrivateInternalFiles/License.txt | 25 -----------------
>  UefiCpuPkg/License.txt                 | 25 -----------------
>  Vlv2DeviceRefCodePkg/License.txt       | 25 -----------------
>  Vlv2TbltDevicePkg/License.txt          | 25 -----------------
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to