On 19/09/2017 13:43, Hao Wu wrote:
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695
> 
> Within function CoreRestoreTpl(), left shift a negative value -2 is used
> in:
> "while (((-2 << NewTpl) & gEventPending) != 0) {"
> 
> which involves undefined behavior.
> 
> According to the C11 spec, Section 6.5.7:
>> 4 The result of E1 << E2 is E1 left-shifted E2 bit positions; vacated
>>   bits are filled with zeros. If E1 has an unsigned type, the value
>>   of the result is E1 * 2^E2 , reduced modulo one more than the
>>   maximum value representable in the result type. If E1 has a signed
>>   type and nonnegative value, and E1 * 2^E2 is representable in the
>>   result type, then that is the resulting value; otherwise, the
>>   behavior is undefined.
> 
> This commit explicitly cast '-2' with UINTN to resolve this issue.
> 
> Cc: Steven Shi <[email protected]>
> Cc: Star Zeng <[email protected]>
> Cc: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <[email protected]>
> ---
>  MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Event/Tpl.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Event/Tpl.c 
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Event/Tpl.c
> index 8ad0a33701..8c50f61117 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Event/Tpl.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Event/Tpl.c
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ CoreRestoreTpl (
>    //
>    // Dispatch any pending events
>    //
> -  while (((-2 << NewTpl) & gEventPending) != 0) {
> +  while (((((UINTN)-2) << NewTpl) & gEventPending) != 0) {
>      gEfiCurrentTpl = (UINTN) HighBitSet64 (gEventPending);
>      if (gEfiCurrentTpl < TPL_HIGH_LEVEL) {
>        CoreSetInterruptState (TRUE);
> 

Maybe:

  for (;;) {
    PendingTpl = (UINTN) HighBitSet64 (gEventPending);
    if (NewTpl >= PendingTpl) {
      break;
    }
    gEfiCurrentTpl = PendingTpl;
  }

This is much more readable, and HighBitSet64 should be efficient on most
modern processors.

Paolo
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to