On 19/09/2017 13:43, Hao Wu wrote:
> NewValue = 0;
> for (Index = 0; Index < 32; Index++) {
> - if ((Value & (1 << Index)) != 0) {
> - NewValue = NewValue | (1 << (31 - Index));
> + if ((Value & (((UINT32)1) << Index)) != 0) {
> + NewValue = NewValue | (((UINT32)1) << (31 - Index));
> }Why not just "1u" instead of the cast? Paolo _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
