On 01/29/19 14:13, Ni, Ray wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Laszlo >> Ersek >> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 7:12 PM >> To: Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org >> Cc: Zimmer, Vincent <vincent.zim...@intel.com>; Wolman, Ayellet >> <ayellet.wol...@intel.com>; Cetola, Stephano <stephano.cet...@intel.com>; >> Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com> >> Subject: Re: [edk2] [RFC] Proposal to split Pkgs
>> Regarding the benefits, I agree that we need clearer / finer grained >> assignments >> between modules / packages and maintainers. I'm unsure if that really >> requires >> reorganizing the tree (we could just reorganize Maintainers.txt instead -- >> add >> some pathname patterns), but I agree that reorganizing the tree is one method >> that could work. > I agree adding more information in Maintainers.txt works as well. > Thanks for providing the "pathname pattern" idea. > I may do that in parallel to find more maintainers for MdeModulePkg. > Do you agree to have more than 2 maintainers for MdeModulePkg? I certainly do; I think we should assign maintainers under MdeModulePkg on a module (library instance, driver) basis. Thanks, Laszlo _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
