Tim,
VFR spec definition for formset opcode in the follow format:
vfrFormSetDefinition ::=
"formset"
"guid" "=" guidDefinition ","
"title" "=" getStringId ","
"help" "=" getStringId ","
{ "classguid" "=" classguidDefinition "," }
{ "class" "=" classDefinition "," }
{ "subclass" "=" subclassDefinition "," }
vfrFormSetList
"endformset" ";"
Because "classguid" "class" and "subclass" are all optional, we can't correctly
detect the end of the opcode and don't know which place we can put the ";".
We can update the definition to use ";" at the end. I just curious why your
raise this issue? Does this format not meet your special request? Or just found
this definition not follows VFR code style?
Thanks,
Eric
From: Tim Lewis [mailto:tim.le...@insyde.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 2:40 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [edk2] ";" rules for formset in VFR?
Is there some specific reason why "vfrFormSetDefinition" does not have a ";"
after the "subclass" keyword? Instead it uses a comma. But "form" and every
other statement ends in a ";"
Tim
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, SSIS, SSRS
and more. Get SQL Server skills now (including 2012) with LearnDevNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts.
SALE $99.99 this month only - learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122512
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
