On 2014-11-12 15:22:18, Andrew Fish wrote: > > On Nov 12, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> > > wrote: > > Too bad the DebugAgent isn't actually useful for all the trouble it > > causes. :) > > 1st question what is wrong with the DebugAgent? Why is int not > useful?
Last time I looked at it you had to get about 4 pieces of software talking together, and half of them were closed source. (For a while, I think you needed a separate Windows machine as well.) > 2nd question why are you using the DebugAgent, I am not. > when you could just use the QEMU built in gdb stub? I've put some effort into this. It kind of works. DEBUG works better. I think there could be value to using the EDK II DebugAgent solution, despite availability of the the gdb stub ... if it was actually easier to use than DEBUG. -Jordan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
