> On Nov 12, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 2014-11-12 15:22:18, Andrew Fish wrote:
>>> On Nov 12, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com
>>> <mailto:jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>> wrote:
>>> Too bad the DebugAgent isn't actually useful for all the trouble it
>>> causes. :)
>>
>> 1st question what is wrong with the DebugAgent? Why is int not
>> useful?
>
> Last time I looked at it you had to get about 4 pieces of software
> talking together, and half of them were closed source. (For a while, I
> think you needed a separate Windows machine as well.)
>
Sorry for the stupid question, we don’t use the Open Source DebugAgent.
I assumed there would be a Python script to convert to WinDBG to gdb-remote.
>> 2nd question why are you using the DebugAgent,
>
> I am not.
>
>> when you could just use the QEMU built in gdb stub?
>
> I've put some effort into this. It kind of works. DEBUG works better.
>
Do you mean DEBUG prints?
> I think there could be value to using the EDK II DebugAgent solution,
> despite availability of the the gdb stub ... if it was actually easier
> to use than DEBUG.
>
Are there just not scripts to load symbols with gdb?
Thanks,
Andrew Fish
> -Jordan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
