On 11/26/14 14:02, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Here's what I propose: let's keep my *v3* patch (ie. not this v2 one) > as-is, and I will send a followup patch (as PATCH v3 2/1) that covers > the above. I think it makes some sense to keep the patches separate, as > the first one fixes an actual mis-mapping, while the second one will fix > incorrect population of Reserved fields.
I've changed my mind -- I'll rather resend the patchset (== both patches) anew, with more context lines for easier reviewability. Thanks! Laszlo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
