Donald Burrill wrote: > Well, it _might_ be. Depends on what hypothesis was being tested, > doesn't it? And so far "rjkim" hasn't deigned to tell us that. Yes, though I think the vocabulary can obscure what goes on. To me a "one-tailed" test should refer to the distribution to retain the meaning of "tail" and hence is a confusing term if used without further explanation. Thom ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ =================================================================
- Two sided test with the chi-square distribution? rjkim
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distribution? Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distribution? Rich Ulrich
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distributio... Alan McLean
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distrib... dennis roberts
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square dis... Alan McLean
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distrib... Glen Barnett
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distribution? Rich Strauss
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distributio... dennis roberts
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distrib... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square dis... Thom Baguley
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-squar... jim clark
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-s... Thom Baguley
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-s... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the c... jim clark
- Re: Two sided test with the c... dennis roberts
- Re: Two sided test with the c... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the c... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the c... jim clark
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-squar... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-s... Thom Baguley