Donald Burrill wrote: > Only if you are unwilling to assume that the writer of the term shares > your understanding of proper usage; no? True. OTOH I feel I have a good case here (and, of course, I think my opinion is correct!). Jim raised a not unreasonable objection - that the use of one-tailed = directional is very widespread. My counter is that: - those of us who teach ought to help try and clear up the confusion - those who write or review ought to propogate good, clear reporting Thom (I think an earlier reply of mine bounced - so forgive a repeat). ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ =================================================================
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square dis... Thom Baguley
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square... jim clark
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-sq... Thom Baguley
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-sq... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the c... jim clark
- Re: Two sided test with the c... dennis roberts
- Re: Two sided test with the c... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the c... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the c... jim clark
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-sq... Thom Baguley
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distribution... Bob Wheeler
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distrib... Rich Strauss
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square dis... Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square... Bob Wheeler
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distrib... Jay Warner