Donald Burrill wrote:
> Only if you are unwilling to assume that the writer of the term shares
> your understanding of proper usage; no?
True. OTOH I feel I have a good case here (and, of course, I think my opinion
is correct!).
Jim raised a not unreasonable objection - that the use of one-tailed =
directional is very widespread. My counter is that:
- those of us who teach ought to help try and clear up the confusion
- those who write or review ought to propogate good, clear reporting
Thom
(I think an earlier reply of mine bounced - so forgive a repeat).
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square dis... Thom Baguley
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square... jim clark
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-sq... Thom Baguley
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-sq... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the c... jim clark
- Re: Two sided test with the c... dennis roberts
- Re: Two sided test with the c... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the c... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the c... jim clark
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square... Donald Burrill
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-sq... Thom Baguley
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distribution... Bob Wheeler
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distrib... Rich Strauss
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square dis... Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square... Bob Wheeler
- Re: Two sided test with the chi-square distrib... Jay Warner
