when we discuss things like power, beta, type I error, etc. ... we often
show a 2 by 2 table ... similar to

                 null true        null false

retain           correct          type II, beta

reject           type I, alpha     power


i think that we need a bit of overhaul to this typical way of doing things ... 

1. each cell needs to have a name ... label ... that reflects the
consequence of the decision (retain, reject) that was made

i propose something along the lines of

                  null true                             null false

retain        type I correct, 1C                     type II error, 2E

reject        type I error, 1E                       type II correct, 2C


then, we have names or symbols for probabilities attached to each cell

                   null true                      null false

retain          WHAT NAME/SYMBOL FOR THIS??        beta

reject              alpha                          power


DOES ANYONE HAVE SOME SUGGESTION AS TO HOW THE UPPER LEFT CELL MIGHT BE
REFERRED TO via A SYMBOL??? OR, SOME NAME THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM POWER BUT
... STILL GIVES THE FLAVOR THAT A CORRECT DECISION HAS BEEN MADE (better
than making an error)?

2. i think it would be helpful to first identify each cell with a
distinctive label ... describing the decision (correct, error) and ... the
type ... 1 or 2

3. i think it would be helpful to have a system where there are names for
EACH cell (why should the poor upper left be "left" out in the cold??) ...
FIRST ... then some OTHER name/symbol for the probability associated with
that cell

confusions that might be avoided would be like:

a. saying type II error is the same as beta ... 
b. saying that power is NOT a name for a decision but, rather, THE
probability of making some particular decision

we have special names for errors of the first and second kind .... type I
and type II ... and we have symbols of alpha and beta to represent their
associated probabilities

we have power which is supposed to be the probability of making a certain
kind of decision ... but, no special name for THAT cell like we have given
to differentiate the two kinds of errors one can make ...

any support out there to try to right this somewhat ambiguous ship? 
==============================================================
dennis roberts, penn state university
educational psychology, 8148632401
http://roberts.ed.psu.edu/users/droberts/drober~1.htm


=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================

Reply via email to