edstat-l  

Messages by Date

• 2001/03/15 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Rich Ulrich
• 2001/03/15 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & Jerry Dallal
• 2001/03/15 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Rich Ulrich
• 2001/03/15 Re: Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Paul R Swank
• 2001/03/15 MIT numbers. Was: Re: On inappropriate hy. Rich Ulrich
• 2001/03/15 Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk dennis roberts
• 2001/03/15 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Thom Baguley
• 2001/03/15 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Thom Baguley
• 2001/03/15 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Jerry Dallal
• 2001/03/14 faculty salaries Bob Hayden
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Alan McLean
• 2001/03/14 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk dennis roberts
• 2001/03/14 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Irving Scheffe
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Jerry Dallal
• 2001/03/14 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Irving Scheffe
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Jerry Dallal
• 2001/03/14 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Radford Neal
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Alan McLean
• 2001/03/14 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk dennis roberts
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Alan McLean
• 2001/03/14 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Rich Ulrich
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test jim clark
• 2001/03/14 Wir zahlen Ihnen jede menge Kohle f�r�s Surfen! Moosman
• 2001/03/14 Computing the variance of cumulative survival-rate (kaplan-meier) Bernd Weiss
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test RD
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test RD
• 2001/03/14 Re: Discrete approximation of a cont. distribution Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/14 GAUSS vs. Matlab Vadim Marmer
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test dennis roberts
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Robert J. MacG. Dawson
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Jerry Dallal
• 2001/03/14 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test J E H Shaw
• 2001/03/14 1 tail 2 tail mumbo jumbo dennis roberts
• 2001/03/14 Discrete approximation of a cont. distribution Tomas L�gland
• 2001/03/14 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Thom Baguley
• 2001/03/13 Re: IRT/Rasch Modeling with SAS? John Uebersax
• 2001/03/13 How's this for a 'brain-storming' idea?!? Robert Gregory
• 2001/03/13 Optimal Sample Size Determined by Confidence Interval Scott
• 2001/03/13 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Alan McLean
• 2001/03/13 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Radford Neal
• 2001/03/13 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Radford Neal
• 2001/03/13 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test RD
• 2001/03/13 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Irving Scheffe
• 2001/03/13 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Irving Scheffe
• 2001/03/13 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Irving Scheffe
• 2001/03/13 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Irving Scheffe
• 2001/03/13 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Will Hopkins
• 2001/03/13 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test
• 2001/03/13 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/13 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test dennis roberts
• 2001/03/13 Re: java - statistic dennis roberts
• 2001/03/13 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test RD
• 2001/03/13 java - statistic Paolo Covelli
• 2001/03/13 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk dennis roberts
• 2001/03/13 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Rich Ulrich
• 2001/03/13 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Jerry Dallal
• 2001/03/13 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/13 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Robert J. MacG. Dawson
• 2001/03/13 Re: IRT/Rasch Modeling with SAS? Alex Yu
• 2001/03/13 how could i forget? dennis roberts
• 2001/03/13 applets dennis roberts
• 2001/03/13 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test dennis roberts
• 2001/03/12 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Donald Burrill
• 2001/03/12 Re: Avoiding Linear Dependencies in Artificial Data Sets Bob Wheeler
• 2001/03/12 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Will Hopkins
• 2001/03/12 Speaking of ANOVA in SPSS... Will Hopkins
• 2001/03/12 Re: Avoiding Linear Dependencies in Artificial Data Sets Elliot Cramer
• 2001/03/12 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Jerry Dallal
• 2001/03/12 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical jim clark
• 2001/03/12 Re: Post-test after ANOVA Lise DeShea
• 2001/03/12 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Irving Scheffe
• 2001/03/12 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical Radford Neal
• 2001/03/12 Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Thom Baguley
• 2001/03/12 Re: Avoiding Linear Dependencies in Artificial Data Sets Bob Wheeler
• 2001/03/12 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Thom Baguley
• 2001/03/12 One tailed vs. Two tailed test auda
• 2001/03/12 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk dennis roberts
• 2001/03/12 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical jim clark
• 2001/03/12 IRT/Rasch Modeling with SAS? Lee Creighton
• 2001/03/12 Re: Post-test after ANOVA Miguel Verdu
• 2001/03/12 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Radford Neal
• 2001/03/12 Avoiding Linear Dependencies in Artificial Data Sets jim clark
• 2001/03/12 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Thom Baguley
• 2001/03/12 Post-test after ANOVA DSJAY
• 2001/03/11 ISO: Statistics refresher course/tutorial T.S. Lim
• 2001/03/11 GRAND OPENING www.tooltoad.com GRAND OPENING www.tooltoad.com
• 2001/03/11 Re: ARMA Rajiv Singh
• 2001/03/11 Re: credit risk analysis outlier
• 2001/03/11 subscription AMMAR
• 2001/03/10 Re: Patenting a statistical innovation dennis roberts
• 2001/03/10 ARMA Vadim Marmer
• 2001/03/10 Re: Easy question Wenjing Dai
• 2001/03/10 Re: Easy question Donald Burrill
• 2001/03/10 SUBscribe edstat-l Awahab El-Naggar
• 2001/03/09 statistical education and the saber-tooth curriculum DRPHILGOOD
• 2001/03/09 Check Out the Best Prices for Your Toner Cartridges caminthela
• 2001/03/09 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Radford Neal
• 2001/03/09 Easy question Wei Xiao
• 2001/03/09 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Thom Baguley
• 2001/03/09 Re: multivariate normality William B. Ware
• 2001/03/09 Meta-Analysis of Survival-Data Bernd Weiss
• 2001/03/08 Re: multivariate normality yogab
• 2001/03/08 Re: Regression with repeated measures Donald Burrill
• 2001/03/08 Re: multivariate normality Glen Barnett
• 2001/03/08 Re: multivariate normality David Heiser
• 2001/03/08 Re: multivariate normality Elliot Cramer
• 2001/03/08 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk RCKnodt
• 2001/03/08 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Irving Scheffe
• 2001/03/08 multivariate normality yogab
• 2001/03/08 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Rich Ulrich
• 2001/03/08 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Irving Scheffe
• 2001/03/08 Re: Distribution transformation - log odds Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/08 Re: power,beta, etc. Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/08 Re: Patenting a statistical innovation Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/08 Re: Guidence requested Rahat Bokhari
• 2001/03/08 Re: Guidence requested Paige Miller
• 2001/03/08 Re: Patenting a statistical innovation Paige Miller
• 2001/03/08 Guidence requested Rahat Bokhari
• 2001/03/08 cerco esercizi di statistica Donata Pietrafesa
• 2001/03/07 Re: Patenting a statistical innovation Peter Lewycky
• 2001/03/07 Re: Patenting a statistical innovation Warren Sarle
• 2001/03/07 Re: Patenting a statistical innovation Jay Warner
• 2001/03/07 Re: Patenting a statistical innovation A.J. Rossini
• 2001/03/07 Re: Patenting a statistical innovation Donald Burrill
• 2001/03/07 Re: Patenting a statistical innovation Paige Miller
• 2001/03/06 Re: FYI: data sets to check accuracy of stat packages Alan Miller
• 2001/03/06 Distribution transformation - log odds George C. Scott
• 2001/03/06 Re: FYI: data sets to check accuracy of stat packages George MacKenzie
• 2001/03/06 Sparletter mit den neusten Angeboten !!! Sparletterman
• 2001/03/06 nomographs dennis roberts
• 2001/03/06 Re: norm curve template Donald Burrill
• 2001/03/06 norm curve template dennis roberts
• 2001/03/06 Re: Trend analysis question: follow-up Rich Ulrich
• 2001/03/06 FYI: data sets to check accuracy of stat packages EAKIN MARK E
• 2001/03/06 Re: Cronbach's alpha and sample size Nicolas Sander
• 2001/03/05 Re: Trend analysis question: follow-up Donald Burrill
• 2001/03/05 Important news vital for this weekend! robert
• 2001/03/05 Re: power,beta, etc. Lise DeShea
• 2001/03/05 Re: power,beta, etc. dennis roberts
• 2001/03/05 Brand New E-Mail pager for FR-EE! b4h443
• 2001/03/05 Re: basic stats question Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/05 Re: basic stats question Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/05 Re: power,beta, etc. Donald Burrill
• 2001/03/05 Re: power,beta, etc. Mike Granaas
• 2001/03/05 Re: power,beta, etc. dennis roberts
• 2001/03/05 New Age New Age.
• 2001/03/05 Re: Trend analysis question Robert Ellis
• 2001/03/04 Re: Trend analysis question - Thanks Philip Cozzolino
• 2001/03/04 Re: power,beta, etc. Donald Burrill
• 2001/03/04 Re: Trend analysis question Karl L. Wuensch
• 2001/03/04 Re: power,beta, etc. Karl L. Wuensch
• 2001/03/04 Re: Census Bureau nixes sampling on 2000 count Rich Ulrich
• 2001/03/04 Re: power,beta, etc. dennis roberts
• 2001/03/03 Re: power,beta, etc. Donald Burrill
• 2001/03/03 Re: Trend analysis question Donald Burrill
• 2001/03/03 Re: basic stats question Milo Schield
• 2001/03/03 Final CFP: WI-2001 (Web Intelligence) Ning Zhong
• 2001/03/03 Trend analysis question Philip Cozzolino
• 2001/03/03 power,beta, etc. dennis roberts
• 2001/03/03 Re: Fisher's z-transformation Donald Burrill
• 2001/03/03 Fisher's z-transformation Arenson, Ethan
• 2001/03/03 Re: probability definition Richard A. Beldin
• 2001/03/03 Re: basic stats question Richard A. Beldin
• 2001/03/03 Re: basic stats question Herman Rubin
• 2001/03/03 multi-dimensional Girsanov Vadim Marmer
• 2001/03/02 Spss TableCurve 2d v.5 Help Request - corrupt sigmaplot template saffron renchler
• 2001/03/02 Re: Post-hoc comparisons Rich Ulrich
• 2001/03/02 Re: probability definition Harold E. Brooks
• 2001/03/02 Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk Rich Ulrich
• 2001/03/02 March 2001 Issue of SecondMoment correspondence
• 2001/03/02 Re: probability definition Richard A. Beldin
• 2001/03/02 Re: basic stats question Richard A. Beldin
• 2001/03/02 Re: Post-hoc comparisons Donald Burrill
• 2001/03/02 time series analysis software Highland Statistics Ltd.
• 2001/03/02 Re: Post-hoc comparisons Paul R Swank
• 2001/03/02 Re: Post-hoc comparisons William B. Ware
• 2001/03/02 Re: Census Bureau nixes sampling on 2000 count dennis roberts
• 2001/03/02 There yours for FREE! zx11zx14
• 2001/03/02 Post-hoc comparisons Esa M. Rantanen
• 2001/03/02 Re: basic stats question George W. Cobb
• 2001/03/02 Census Bureau nixes sampling on 2000 count J. Williams
• 2001/03/02 Final CFP: IAT-2001 iat01
• 2001/03/01 ANN: Book: Causation, Prediction, and Search wolfskil
• 2001/03/01 book announcement--Spirtes Jud Wolfskill
• 2001/03/01 comparing multiple correlated correlations Allyson Rosen
• 2001/03/01 Re: Regression with repeated measures Rich Ulrich
• 2001/03/01 Re: Regression with repeated measures Thom Baguley
• 2001/03/01 Re: Cronbach's alpha and sample size Nicolas Sander
• 2001/03/01 Re: Regression with repeated measures Thom Baguley
• 2001/02/28 Publisher Contacts Joe Ward
• 2001/02/28 The currency market may be your answer. 30528 littleapril
• 2001/02/28 Re: probability definition Herman Rubin
• 2001/02/28 Re: basic stats question Herman Rubin
• 2001/02/28 StatSite Gary Smith
• 2001/02/28 Re: Regression with repeated measures Gary Winkel

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]