Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk

[dennis roberts]

At 04:10 PM 3/14/01 -0500, Rich Ulrich wrote:

>Oh, I see.   You do the opposite.  Your own
>flabby rationalizations might be subtly valid,
>and, on close examination,
>*do*  have some relationship to the questions....


could we ALL please lower a notch or two ... the darts and arrows? i can't 
keep track of who started what and who is tossing the latest flames but ... 
somehow, i think we can do a little better than this ... 



=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================