Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk

[Radford Neal]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Rich Ulrich  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>(This guy is already posting irrelevant rants as if 
>I've driven him up the wall or something.  So this 
>is just another poke in the eye with a blunt stick, to see
>what he will swing at next....)

I think we may take this as an admission by Mr. Ulrich that he is
incapable of advancing any sensible argument in favour of his
position.  Certainly he's never made any sensible response to my
criticism.  Given this comment (albeit directed to someone else), 
I think I'll retire from the debate.

   Radford Neal

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Radford M. Neal                                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Statistics and Dept. of Computer Science [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Toronto                     http://www.cs.utoronto.ca/~radford
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================