EAKIN MARK E ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: While I do not grade on a curve, I feel that if reasons exist,it is more
: valid to adjust atypical grades distributions than not to adjust them. 
: My reason for not grading on a curve is more for class harmony. Grading on
: a curve often means taking points away from some students while adding to
: others. I noticed that a class can suddenly become hostile if some
: students are treated better than others. This hostile environment can be
: detrimental to a class's performance also.

To put it even more bluntly, grading "on a curve" really means 
establishing a budget of grade points and then distributing that budget 
among the students, which means that the grade a particular student gets 
depends not only on the distribution decisions but on the size of the 
budget.  Where on earth does this concept of a budget come from?  It 
implies at least two questionable, to say the least, underlying assumptions:

1) That the "total" of whatever it is that grades are supposed to measure 
is a constant depending only on class size.

2) That it's possible to evaluate the collective performance of a group 
on a task *before* they've performed that task.

The purpose of a budget is to make it possible to allocate limited 
resources.  Since when is academic performance a limited resource, or 
even any sort of resource subject to allocation?  What on earth does it 
mean to say to a student "your performance would be an A, but that would 
put me over budget so I can only give you a B" or "your performance would 
be a D, but I've got some extra grade points left over so I can give you 
a C"?

The disharmony you talk about is really the result of pitting students 
against each other in such a way that each student's success depends on 
other students' failure.  Why would someone want to do this?  If we're 
not talking about allocating an inherently scarce resource, the only 
reason I can think of is a deliberate desire to create disharmony in 
order to use "divide and conquer" to prevent collective action.  If the 
students resent each other, they won't band together and hatch a plot to 
murder the instructor, but they also won't band together and help each 
other learn (in the Real World, sharing your knowledge with someone 
doesn't "drain" you of knowledge; in fact, it often increases your store 
of knowledge).

Reply via email to