On 24 Jan 2000 09:08:59 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bushaw, Gordon
-ADMIN) wrote:
> A related question-
> I seem to remember reading or hearing that the sex of a child after the
> first is substantially more likely to match the sex of the previous child
> than not. Does anyone have any information about this, or is it complete
> nonsense?
It would be complete nonsense if anyone claimed that.
But you are probably imagining it.
--
Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
===========================================================================
This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, people lacking respect
for other members of the list send messages that are inappropriate
or unrelated to the list's discussion topics. Please just delete the
offensive email.
For information concerning the list, please see the following web page:
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===========================================================================
