Look up papers by Stuart Hurlburt, who points up commonly-made errors in
ecological research. Two of note are his paper on pseudoreplication (in
Ecological Monographs, circa 1989, I think) and "The Spatial
Distribution of the Montane Unicorn" (I don't recall the journal).
V. Partridge
Uplandcrow wrote:
>
> I teach research methods for social science at a small liberal arts college.
> The level of math in the class is low, I use Richard Black's "Doing
> Quantitative Research in the Soc. Sci." and excerpts from Gujarati's "Basic
> Econometrics."
>
> (FYI, if you have not seen Black's text yet, take a look. It is a wonderful
> teaching textbook, best I've seen)
>
> I am looking for examples of articles that use a stat procedure incorrectly.
> For example, I have one artivle from a business journal that conducts OLS but
> does not present any F or t tests or even standard errors. Yet the authors make
> inferences about their subject based on their results (essentially on R^2).
>
> In short, if you know of assessable articles which (in your view) misuse a
> particular method (especially descriptive states, ANOVA, OLS, logit, and
> probit) I'd be interested in the reference. Perhaps there is a web site you
> know of that deals with this? I am not out to denegrate anyone's research,
> merely to point out (common?) mistakes as a way to teach my students to be
> careful in their research.
>
> Thanks
===========================================================================
This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, less thoughtful
people send inappropriate messages. Please DO NOT COMPLAIN TO
THE POSTMASTER about these messages because the postmaster has no
way of controlling them, and excessive complaints will result in
termination of the list.
For information about this list, including information about the
problem of inappropriate messages and information about how to
unsubscribe, please see the web page at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===========================================================================
