At 10:06 PM 10/16/00 +0000, Peter Lewycky wrote:
>It happens all the time in medicine. If I can show a p value 0.05 or
>less the researchers are delighted. Whenever I can't produce a p of 0.05
>or less they start looking for another statistician and will even
>withhold a paper from publication. 

gee ... this is too bad ... someone has sold all these folks in medicine a
bill of goods ... 

some possibilities are:

1. those in medicine are not really taking any statistics courses
2. those in medicine are not really reading statistical material very carefully
3. those in medicine have had a bad run of luck WHEN taking data analysis
courses


so, if someone in medicine looks at a paper with findings, and ... the p
value is ok ... REGARDLESS OF THE DESIGN of the study or the way the
investigation was carried out ... then the findings are meaningful ... but
if the p value is less than that magical cutoff ... even if the study seems
sound ... then it is not worthy of the time of day?


==============================================================
dennis roberts, penn state university
educational psychology, 8148632401
http://roberts.ed.psu.edu/users/droberts/drober~1.htm


=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================

Reply via email to