[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
I
> said before, I don't think this can be seen as a problem with hypothesis
> testing; but it is a matter for hypothesis *testers*.
Nothing wrong with this, but it might be a good time to review the
question that started this thread, namely,
"What are the limitations of hypothesis testing using significance
tests
based on p-values?"
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
- Re: questions on hypothesis dennis roberts
- Re: questions on hypothesis Herman Rubin
- Re: questions on hypothesis Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: questions on hypothesis Chris . Chambers
- Re: questions on hypothesis Herman Rubin
- Re: questions on hypothesis David Heiser
- Re: questions on hypothesis dennis roberts
- Re: questions on hypothesis Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: questions on hypothesis Jerry Dallal
- Re: questions on hypothesis Herman Rubin
- Re: questions on hypothesis Jerry Dallal
- Re: questions on hypothesis Thom Baguley
- Re: questions on hypothesis Radford Neal
- Re: questions on hypothesis Herman Rubin
- Re: questions on hypothesis Richard M. Barton
- Re: questions on hypothesis Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: questions on hypothesis Chris . Chambers
- Re: questions on hypothesis Radford Neal
- important failures to reject a nil hypothesis Karl L. Wuensch
- Re: questions on hypothesis Chris . Chambers
- Re: questions on hypothesis Jerry Dallal
