Many posters to this thread have used the phrase "practical
significance". I find it only confuses things. Just so all of us
are
clear on what we're talking about, might we restrict ourselves to
the terms "statistical signficance" and "practical importance"?
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
- Re: questions on hypothesis Peter Lewycky
- Re: questions on hypothesis chris_david_c
- Re: questions on hypothesis dennis roberts
- Re: questions on hypothesis Herman Rubin
- Re: questions on hypothesis Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: questions on hypothesis Chris . Chambers
- Re: questions on hypothesis Herman Rubin
- Re: questions on hypothesis David Heiser
- Re: questions on hypothesis dennis roberts
- Re: questions on hypothesis Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: questions on hypothesis Jerry Dallal
- Re: questions on hypothesis Herman Rubin
- Re: questions on hypothesis Jerry Dallal
- Re: questions on hypothesis Thom Baguley
- Re: questions on hypothesis Radford Neal
- Re: questions on hypothesis Herman Rubin
- Re: questions on hypothesis Richard M. Barton
- Re: questions on hypothesis Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: questions on hypothesis Chris . Chambers
- Re: questions on hypothesis Radford Neal
- important failures to reject a nil hypothesis Karl L. Wuensch
