Ronald Bloom wrote:
> Lastly, I will repeat what I wrote previously: I fail to appreciate
> the alleged signficance of "literacy" or "relative literacy"
> in regard to someone's likelihood of committing one or another
> error of cognition or dexterity in manipulating either simple
> or complex machines.
Perhaps you are just not a connoisseur of stupidity.
--
Ron Hardin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Robert Chung
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... P.G.Hamer
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... mal11
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Paul Thompson
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Rich Ulrich
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Paul Thompson
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Paul Thompson
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Neil W. Henry
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Tom Johnstone
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Ronald Bloom
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Ron Hardin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Ronald Bloom
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Radford Neal
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Ronald Bloom
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... R. Martin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... mal11
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Ronald Bloom
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Eric Bohlman
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... William B. Ware
