Herman Rubin wrote:
> The UK has effective disenfrachisement of most of the
> members of its Liberal party. Also, the US was definitely
> set up NOT to be "democratic"; the British democracy has
> greatly eroded the rights the people won in the Bill of
> Rights and the Petition of Right. Democracy is two wolves
> and a sheep deciding the dinner menu.
It is true that minority parties such as the Liberal Democrats (typically
15-25% in polls) are disenfranchised by the first-pass-the-post General
election system (5-8% in terms of parliamentary seats). However, this is the
same FPTP system in the US elections (excluding the Electoral College) which
effectiviely disenfranchises Green, Libertarian, Reform etc voters. In my view
both would benefit (in terms of fairness) from a more proprtional system.
Thom
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Ronald Bloom
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Michael Granaas
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Herman Rubin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Ronald Bloom
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Herman Rubin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Rachel Pearce
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Jay Warner
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Herman Rubin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Donald Burrill
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Jay Warner
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Thom Baguley
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... P.G.Hamer
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Herman Rubin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Herman Rubin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Anon.
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Peter J. Acklam
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... P.G.Hamer
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Thom Baguley
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... r_karlsson
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Peter J. Acklam
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... P.G.Hamer
