Michael Granaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Magill, Brett wrote:
>
>
> Gore also won consistently among minorities and lower income groups. In
> those cases the stereotype is dead on.
>
> Michael
>
Does this correlate in your view with a higher likelihood
of their submitting fouled or otherwise invalid punched ballot cards?
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Ronald Bloom
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... R. Martin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... mal11
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Ronald Bloom
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Eric Bohlman
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... William B. Ware
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Rich Ulrich
- RE: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Magill, Brett
- RE: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Michael Granaas
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Ronald Bloom
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Michael Granaas
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Herman Rubin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Ronald Bloom
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Herman Rubin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Rachel Pearce
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Jay Warner
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Herman Rubin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of el... Donald Burrill
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Jay Warner
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electio... Thom Baguley
