Joe Galenko wrote:
> Just out of curiousity, I'd like to know what kind of population you could
> have such that a sample mean with N = 200 wouldn't be approximately
> Normally distributed. That would have to be a very, very strange
> distribution indeed.
You can construct them easily as Bernoulli distributions where p is sufficiently
close to 0 or 1. For any N, there exists a p so that the distribution of the
sample mean is noticeably non-normal. Continuous distributions are a bit
harder to describe, but you can use simple perturbations of this idea.
-------------------------------------------------------
gus gassmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
"When in doubt, travel."
Remove NOSPAM in the reply-to address
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling Edward Dreyer
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling Stan Brown
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling dennis roberts
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling @Home
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling dennis roberts
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling Joe Galenko
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling Dennis Roberts
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling Gus Gassmann
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling Gus Gassmann
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling Joe Galenko
- RE: what type of distribution on this sampling David Heiser
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling Rich Ulrich
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: what type of distribution on this sampling J.Russell
- Central Limit Therem Was: Re: what type of di... Herman Rubin
