Brian Sandle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > In talk.politics.drugs Szasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brian Sandle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > <snip> > > >> > >> I maintain training to be deficient. > > > <snip> > > > You know, I just wrote up several different posts detailing the > > laundry list of Sandle's logical fallacies, cheap rhetorical devices, > > and otherwise inane commentary, and then erased each one. > > > I think it insults people's intelligence if I have to point out > > and detail how idiotic it is for you to try to lecture MD-PhDs and PhD > > candidates in clinical psychology in statistics, social sciences, and > > empirical design. So, please declare victory and go home, you're > > giving me a fucking headache. > > You are still doing exactly the same, trying to claim quals as an excuse > for saying anything.
No. I've explained to you what I have been taught, and Erkki independently verified it. I also explained to you (among other things) how idiotic and improper it is for you to propose additional statistical procedures for studies you haven't even read. I have no desire to expend any more energy on this subject with you. > > We should take the points that each person says and examine them, no > matter how lowly or high, with equal care. You do that. > > > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! > -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
