Brian Sandle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > In talk.politics.drugs Szasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brian Sandle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<snip> > > I do not think the book is making enough of the choice of which to use. At > least a couple of examples showing linear and non-linear relationships > would have been nice. So, Sandle is proposing to use a statistical procedure he hasn't ever seen used, on a body of data he isn't familiar with, isn't sure whether it should be used or not, correct? > Then maybe we would have avoided people like PhD > student szasz saying that Pearson's is the basis of everything in > correlation. Actually, you dumb idiot, I said Pearsons product-moment correlation is the basis of virtually all multivariate statistical techniques. On top of everything else, you're not listening to what people tell you. Fuck off, you're an enormous waste of my time, Sandle. Perhaps we'll play again when you want to chat about your Green, pro-prohibition-leanings with us. Otherwise, again, please just declare victory and get the fuck out. > > > > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! > -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
