OK, so no contributions under the direction of a senior. But rather, 
independent activity. Thank you for your help.

Sent from my mobile

> On 10 Jul 2014, at 19:48, Jon Beasley-Murray <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi:
> 
> Your question was: "is there a way to count the contributions that a user has 
> made *on behalf of* another particular user?" (my emphasis)
> 
> And: "It seems to me that the way to overcome this roadblock is to introduce 
> a way of counting the contributions made by a person (say, a research 
> student, or a colleague) *on behalf of* a Professor." (again, my emphasis)
> 
> Which rather sounds like a proxy, by any definition of that term.  
> 
> I would be strongly against encouraging such practices.
> 
> Take care
> 
> Jon
> 
>> On Jul 10, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Jennifer Gristock <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I too believe that the ideal approach is for academics to write about other 
>> people's work: that is why my original question was about ways of 
>> tracing/counting this.
>> 
>> But if you're saying that a research student writing about other people 'a 
>> work (plural, not singular ) is not advisable because they are somehow a 
>> 'proxy', I must say I don't quite see it that way, but thank you for helping 
>> me to see the multiple ways in which this could be construed.
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my mobile
>> 
>>> On 10 Jul 2014, at 18:21, Jon Beasley-Murray <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Jennifer:
>>> 
>>> I would be very wary indeed of the model you're proposing, in which either 
>>> individual researchers or their proxies insert their work into Wikipedia.  
>>> We see enough of that already, and I would be concerned if there were any 
>>> official (or even semi-official) encouragement of the practice.
>>> 
>>> The issue is less conflict of interest (though that's true, too) as 
>>> (self)promotion (which you seem to be actively encouraging) and undue 
>>> weight.
>>> 
>>> This is not to say that professors (academics, researchers) should not be 
>>> writing in their areas of expertise.  Of course they should!  But perhaps a 
>>> rule of thumb is that they should be writing about *other* people's work in 
>>> that area, rather than their own.
>>> 
>>> Take care
>>> 
>>> Jon
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 10, 2014, at 7:43 AM, Jennifer Gristock <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Greetings everyone. I'm still working on that system to encourage 
>>>> university professors to contribute to Wikipedia, a system that is 
>>>> concerned not through teaching, like the Education Programme, but through 
>>>> research.
>>>> 
>>>> I need some help. Can you tell me, in the Wikipedia API, is there a way to 
>>>> count the contributions that a user has made on behalf of another 
>>>> particular user? For example, a professor might ask a group of PhD 
>>>> students to make contributions involving his/her research on various 
>>>> Wikipedia pages, on his/her behalf.
>>>> 
>>>> I have been frequently told (at the Teahouse and elsewhere) that 
>>>> Professors are not allowed to contribute information about their own 
>>>> published research papers on Wikipedia pages, because this would be 
>>>> biased. (Which is rather a downer for the professor, because this means 
>>>> they are forbidden to write about the things they are most passionate and 
>>>> knowledgeable about.) 
>>>> 
>>>> If this is rule is true, then it must certainly be seen as a roadblock to 
>>>> academic engagement with Wikipedia. If it isn't, then it is editors' 
>>>> perception of the rule as true (as I have experienced) that is the 
>>>> roadblock.
>>>> 
>>>> It seems to me that the way to overcome this roadblock is to introduce a 
>>>> way of counting the contributions made by a person (say, a research 
>>>> student, or a colleague) on behalf of a Professor. So at the end of the 
>>>> year, the Professor can say 'my research contributed to X edits on 
>>>> Wikipedia' as easily as each individual student (who might contribute on 
>>>> behalf of many academic researchers) can count their individual edits.
>>>> 
>>>> Can the API accommodate this in some way? Perhaps through some sort of 
>>>> 'project' code or something?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Yours hopefully,
>>>> 
>>>> Jenny Gristock (Open_Research)
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>> 
>>>>> On 9 Jul 2014, at 22:40, LiAnna Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all!
>>>>> 
>>>>> I wanted to draw your attention to the Educator Training we'll be having 
>>>>> as part of the Wikimania Pre-conference on August 7:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education_Pre-Conference/Educator_training
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Educator Training is designed to give educators of all levels the 
>>>>> knowledge they need to use Wikipedia or other Wikimedia projects as a 
>>>>> teaching tool in their classrooms. The training is open to educators from 
>>>>> any country, and Wikipedia editing experience is not required. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you're interested in attending or you know someone who is, please see 
>>>>> the page for more information. I especially encourage anyone who's 
>>>>> thought about getting a Wikipedia Education Program going in your country 
>>>>> to attend, as you'll learn a lot about the different kinds of assignments 
>>>>> students could do.
>>>>> 
>>>>> LiAnna
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> LiAnna Davis
>>>>> Head of Communications and External Relations
>>>>> Wiki Education Foundation
>>>>> +1-415-770-1061
>>>>> www.wikiedu.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please note my new email address and update your contacts accordingly: 
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Education mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Education mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Education mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Education mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Education mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education

_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education

Reply via email to