2015-05-22 10:27 GMT+03:00 Jirka Daněk <[email protected]>: > Thank you all for your helpful suggestions. > > I realized that translating from English instead of the other way around > is certainly a better way to approach this. > > Using ContentTranslation seems the best option, even though it currently > does not contain support for auto translating the en/cs language pair. > It is important to me to be able to see somebody else's unfinished > translation and as far as I know, ContentTranslation does not support that > yet. Is this feature planned? >
Theoretically yes, but we don't have a target date. FWIW, an article can be reviewed after initial publishing, but you probably knew that already. > I know the tool. I was one of the people who campaigned for having it > enabled on cs.Wikipedia ;) > Thanks! > > On that occasion I made a comparison table for all available translation > tools for WIkipedia I know of (Duolingo, Google Translate Toolkit, > ContentTranslation) and CT is a clear winner. Duolingo has problematic ToS > and drops formatting and references, Google Translate for WIkipedia is not > being actively worked on and drops some formatting and references. I guess > as the developers you know all about that ;) > Even bigger thanks! -- Amir
_______________________________________________ Education mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
