On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Nick Wilson (Quiddity) < [email protected]> wrote:
> /me adds emphasis that this is all going to occur Slowwwwwly and > patiently, starting off very small, with much testing, and many (steadily > louder) requests for feedback on the test results. > Yes. We want to communicate plans, and it feels silly to begin every sentence "We'll probably, ... " "We think...", "Most likely...". The truth is you learn by doing and plans change accordingly > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:48 PM, James Salsman <[email protected]> wrote: >> Will permalinks to old conversations survive conversion to Flow? > > > @ James Salsman: Yes for thread links. No for Summary-namespace links. > I wonder how often people link to a particular reply in a LQT thread, e.g. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Thread:Extension_talk:BreadCrumbs/Preferences/reply_(2) I assume people link to threads, e.g. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Summary:Extension_talk:BreadCrumbs/Preferences It seems farfetched that someone would link to a thread summary e.g. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Summary:Extension_talk:BreadCrumbs/Preferences ; just link to the thread and visitors see its summary, if any. -- =S Page Features engineer
_______________________________________________ EE mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ee
