Hi José, nice to hear your 2cents :-)
José Luis Gordo Romero schrieb: > Hello, > > I think that follow the discussion is damaging the project and the two > branches solution for egroupware is a good solution (not the only but > for me the better). > > I like the current codebase and the hard work from Ralf and the rest > (Klaus, Christian, ..) > and > I like the tine20 concepts and features and the hard work from two of > the most egw contributors. > > Let each developer decide to work in your branch (or the two) and the > user install and support your branch. That's my belief of OpenSource! Hope this will be getting true again. Bye Christian > > Just my 2 cent. > José Luis Gordo Romero > > 2008/2/11, Cornelius Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > Hi devs, > > After a hard period (again) of flameing and fighting, we want to make > a proposal to solve the situation(s). > > In our view the current state is the following: > - The majority of egw devs and users don't want to continue this ugly > flame war. > - On the other hand, also nobody wants to have the votes conny proposed. > - No one wants to drop (not even lars or conny) egw 1.x > - Also a big majority don't want to drop Tine 2.0 out of the > egroupware.org <http://egroupware.org> project. > > So here is, what we propose: > - Lets have two emancipated codelines within the framework of the > egroupware.org <http://egroupware.org> project. > - Both activities share the same goal, to provide great collaboration > software based on free and open sources. > - If possible, both activities agree on common technical standards and > implement them in a compatible way > - Tine cares for smooth migration paths from egw to tine > - eGW 1.x (may) ports back new technologies from tine when they where > proven successfully there. > - Both activities decide on their own about new members, coding- > standards, and quality agreements. > - On both web-sites, we'll link each other in a friendly way, e.g. by > aggregating the news feed of the other page. > > We propose to freeze this state for about half a year, before we > continue to discuss about project politics. Hopefully then in a kind > and friendly manner. > > We feel, that continuing the discussions don't lead to any valuable > result. So this is our last attempt. If it fails we will take the Tine > effort out of the egroupware.org <http://egroupware.org> project. > > cu > Lars, Thomas, Matthias and Conny > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > eGroupWare-core mailing list > eGroupWare-core@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:eGroupWare-core@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/egroupware-core > > > > > > -- > Saludos > José Luis Gordo Romero > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > eGroupWare-core mailing list > eGroupWare-core@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/egroupware-core ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ eGroupWare-core mailing list eGroupWare-core@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/egroupware-core
