Some of you have a very interesting interpretation of what rules are  
for and what happened if you break them. Even the definition of  
stateting facts in the public wich are not true or legitimated seems  
to bee more than strange to me. But if this the way you are willing to  
drive this project. Have fun.

Everything is said - so just drive your personally and political  
concepts as you might want to drive them.

For me, some people didn't tell the truth - so, this is also called  
misinformating and manipulating people.
For me, some people lets drive themselfs more by personal frustration  
than by deceiding whats best for this project.
For me, is the shortest and most simply way to get peoples ass in gear  
to shout out loud - it is not always very kindly but it works.

So, egroupware is defenced that was may intension. And the developers  
has to talk to each other if they want to get an conclusion. There are  
different ways in life to get success. I am Lutz Falkenburg. And I am  
like I am so kick me out or respect my objectives and don't play games.

The problems started because of lack of leadership. And they still  
carry on because of missing leadership. Probably we urgently need new  
admins than new codelines.

Try not to play "beleidigte Leberwurst", try to think about what  
happened.

Most of my "insults" are prooved by statements within days ....

Bye Lutz

PS: You are one more developer who suddenly moves his mind and started  
involving in this discussion - its great - but still there are to few  
people.... is there anybody out there?


Am 11.02.2008 um 16:52 schrieb Carsten Wolff:

> Admins,
>
> why are non-developers with a destructive mind allowed to post to - 
> core?
> PLEASE take care of correct posting-rights for the projects  
> mailinglists.
> Half of the postings of the last week have been annoying to read at  
> best.
>
> Lutz,
>
> I can only guess your motivation for what you are doing here. You  
> have nothing
> to contribute to the discussion and you are only trying to make it  
> appear
> like you actually had something to say, by shouting the loudest.
>
> On Monday 11 February 2008, Lutz Falkenburg (irrsinn.de gmbh) wrote:
>> As Yerk and Ubertroll its my duty to comment this proposal.
>
> It's spelled "jerk" and no, you have no such duty.
>
>> I have nothing to say
>
> That is indeed my impression.
>
>> You know that was my intension. But I think you are able to apologize
>> yourself
>
> If anyone should apologize, it's you. You are accusing and insulting  
> people,
> while most accusations appear to be based on speculation or on past  
> events,
> that already had been settled.
>
>> I excuse myself for some words I have written but as the time they
>> where written they were the right words (from my point of view).
>
> "propaganda", "manipulation", "tricks" ... no, not the right words.  
> Just
> insults.
>
> Carsten
> -- 
>           /\-´-/\
>          (  @ @  )
> ________o0O___^___O0o________
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> eGroupWare-core mailing list
> eGroupWare-core@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/egroupware-core


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
eGroupWare-core mailing list
eGroupWare-core@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/egroupware-core

Reply via email to