I apologize, that these mail might bothering you but, as we have heard  
in many posts during this discussion egw is not only a developer  
community there are also users and some developers wich are not  
writing any code.

As Yerk and Ubertroll its my duty to comment this proposal. I try to  
do this as reasonable as possible without any personal accuses.

Am 11.02.2008 um 13:22 schrieb Cornelius Weiss:

> Hi devs,
>
> After a hard period (again) of flameing and fighting, we want to  
> make a proposal to solve the situation(s).

> In our view the current state is the following:
> - The majority of egw devs and users don't want to continue this  
> ugly flame war.
> - On the other hand, also nobody wants to have the votes conny  
> proposed.
> - No one wants to drop (not even lars or conny) egw 1.x
> - Also a big majority don't want to drop Tine 2.0 out of the  
> egroupware.org project.
>

Sorry, but this is your personal opinion. I do not think the whole  
community has the same point of view ;)
And I am not seeing those big majorities you mentioned. I see a big  
majority with is using egrouware and happy with the most application.  
No the big picture is to lets innovation taking place without  
frustrating the users.

> So here is, what we  propose:
> - Lets have two emancipated codelines within the framework of the  
> egroupware.org project.
> - Both activities share the same goal, to provide great  
> collaboration software based on free and open sources.
> - If possible, both activities agree on common technical standards  
> and implement them in a compatible way
> - Tine cares for smooth migration paths from egw to tine
> - eGW 1.x (may) ports back new technologies from tine when they  
> where proven successfully there.
> - Both activities decide on their own about new members, coding- 
> standards, and quality agreements.
> - On both web-sites, we'll link each other in a friendly way, e.g.  
> by aggregating the news feed of the other page.
>

So Tine ist not a proposal for the future codeline of egroupware? You  
are talking about coexistence? Are you correcting your statement made  
to the press with a new one? Because google never forgets!

But what you are mentioned above is in my understanding a fork, isn't  
it?

> We propose to freeze this state for about half a year, before we  
> continue to discuss about project politics. Hopefully then in a kind  
> and friendly manner.
>

I have nothing to say, I am only a "blood sucking ubertroll" but this  
sounds good for me.

> We feel, that continuing the discussions don't lead to any valuable  
> result. So this is our last attempt. If it fails we will take the  
> Tine effort out of the egroupware.org project.
>

You know that was my intension. But I think you are able to apologize  
yourself - you did half a way with this proposal. But it is still my  
intension (if I had something to say) that consequences has taken  
place for breaking rules. But fortunately I have nothing to decide.  
So, sorry for take you some time but mostly I started the flamewar to  
get some others into gears and from my point of view this could be a  
an agree on a ceasefire.

I excuse myself for some words I have written but as the time they  
where written they were the right words (from my point of view).

Regards Lutz (mainly yerk and ubertroll)


> cu
> Lars, Thomas, Matthias and Conny
> <tine_egw_relation>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/_______________________________________________
> eGroupWare-core mailing list
> eGroupWare-core@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/egroupware-core


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
eGroupWare-core mailing list
eGroupWare-core@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/egroupware-core

Reply via email to