Hi! Kirk Pepperdine wrote: > >From the 1.1 spec is would appear as if the container has the option of > delegating any method call from a client to any stateless session bean > thats in it's pool. So each of foo, bar, and baz would run in a different > stateless session bean. > > Does this sound right? It sounds very right. I would be very surprised if any EJB server does it differently. /Rickard -- Rickard �berg @home: +46 13 177937 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dreambean.com Question reality =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- Re: Stateless Session Beans John Kidd
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Assaf Arkin
- Re: Stateless Session Beans John Kidd
- Re: Stateless Session Beans James Cook
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Benoit Tremblay
- Re: Stateless Session Beans John Kidd
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Assaf Arkin
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Chris Raber
- Re: Stateless Session Beans John Kidd
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Kirk Pepperdine
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Rickard �berg
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Tim Endres
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Laird Nelson
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Marc San Soucie
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Jeff Martin
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Kirk Pepperdine
- Re: Stateless Session Beans francis pouatcha
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Kirk Pepperdine
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Kirk Pepperdine
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Assaf Arkin
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Mark Cade
