> From the 1.1 spec is would appear as if the container has the option of
> delegating any method call from a client to any stateless session bean
> thats in it's pool. So each of foo, bar, and baz would run in a different
> stateless session bean.
>
> Does this sound right?
Change 'would run' to 'could run', and yes it sounds right.
Otherwise, what would be the point of remaining stateless?
There is no state to be concerned with between method calls,
so why do you care which particular bean handles it?
tim.
Tim Endres - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICE Engineering, Inc. - http://www.ice.com/
"USENET - a slow moving self parody." - Peter Honeyman
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
