Kirk Pepperdine wrote: > > >From the 1.1 spec is would appear as if the container has > the option of delegating any method call from a client to > any stateless session bean thats in it's pool. So each of > foo, bar, and baz would run in a different stateless session > bean. > > Does this sound right? Yeah. Since stateless session beans have no data, they are all equal, and it doesn't really matter which equivalent bean serves any request. Jeff =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Benoit Tremblay
- Re: Stateless Session Beans John Kidd
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Assaf Arkin
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Chris Raber
- Re: Stateless Session Beans John Kidd
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Kirk Pepperdine
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Rickard �berg
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Tim Endres
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Laird Nelson
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Marc San Soucie
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Jeff Martin
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Kirk Pepperdine
- Re: Stateless Session Beans francis pouatcha
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Kirk Pepperdine
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Kirk Pepperdine
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Assaf Arkin
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Mark Cade
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Kirk Pepperdine
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Assaf Arkin
- Re: Stateless Session Beans James Cook
- Re: Stateless Session Beans Assaf Arkin
