Hi,
        
        TogetherSoft supports EJB representation. But it is a limited support. Infact 
in event trace diagram, it should know the interaction between the HI,RI and the bean. 
But there we have to explicitly specify the interaction.Also even if we give a wrong 
interaction, like a method in bean calling method in RI , still it doesnt give any 
error.

        Infact I think there is no need to represent the HI,RI and the bean explicitly 
in the Event Trace diagram. It is known according to the EJB Specification what 
component calls what(Also it is known that Life Cycle methods go into the HI/bean and 
the Businesss methods go into RI/Bean). So if they are coming up with a specification 
for representing EJBs in UML, they should consider this. You should represent an EJB 
package in a Event Trace diagram instead of each individual component like RI, HI.
Any comments?
Cheers,
Parikshit

***********************************************************
              )  (       
             ) ) (
           ( (  ) )
         )  )  (  (
    ____________
    \                      /\
      \    JAVA   / \/    -- brewing the future of computing
    __\______/____
    ----------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Parikshit Pol
Systems Executive
KPIT System Ltd.
Phone : 91-020-5468654 ext. - 212
______________________________________________________________________________________________


-----Original Message-----
From:   Chris Raber [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, January 21, 2000 9:08 AM
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        Re: Creating EJB's from UML

Given that EJB interfaces and such are simply java interfaces, I would
think
any UML tool with forward engineering could be used to gen the
equivelant
Java sources. Have you looked at Together J? I have not used it but here
good things from my customers. Apparently you can toggle between code
and
UML and the two are always synched (no forward or reverse engineering).
It
is not the full UML tool that Rational is, but from a
designer/developers
view might be the right mix.

-Chris.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Walnes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 4:26 AM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Creating EJB's from UML
>
> Are there any tools around that can generate EJB client interfaces,
home
> interfaces and skeleton implementations from UML diagrams?
>
> I've searched around but cannot find any.
>
> -Joe Walnes
>
>
========================================================================
==
> =
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email
to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

========================================================================
===
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

�������������������������o unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to